Review of: Britain’s Bomb: What Next? Edited by Brian Wicker and Hugh Beach. London: SCM Press, 2006. xii + 212 pp. £ -- (pb). ISBN 0–334–04096–596–5.
Authors Reusing Their Own Work
SAGE Journal authors are able to use their article in certain circumstances without any further permission. The chart above includes common requests and an explanation of which ‘version’ of the article can be used in each circumstance.
- Version 1 – original submission to the journal (before peer review)
- Version 2 – original submission to the journal with your revisions after peer review, often the version accepted by the editor
- Version 3 – copy-edited and typeset proofs and the final published version
upload my article to my institution repository or department website Version 2
Abstract
By the time this review is published, Tony Blair will no longer be Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. He pushed for a decision to be taken by the next general election: he wanted the UK to commit to replacing the current Trident system (a stock of 58 missiles and under 200 warheads, some of these housed on four nuclear submarines) with a new generation of nuclear weapons and submarines. The British Trident submarines are scheduled for retirement between 2019 and 2024, and the warheads have a limited lifespan as well. Although options existed for extending the current system up to 2051, the House of Commons voted in March 2007 by a strong margin to spend at least £20 billion to replace Trident. However, 88 Labour MPs defected from the vote, which was characterised as a strong blow to Blair’s leadership.
