First and Last Name/s of Presenters

Cassie SimonidesFollow

Mentor/s

Dr. LaTina Steele

Participation Type

Poster

Abstract

Epiphyte communities are increasingly recognized as important contributors to marsh food webs. However, little is known about the distribution of epiphytic organisms inhabiting Spartina alterniflora stems. This study examined epiphytic algae and meiofauna on S. alterniflora stems at four sites in Connecticut and four sites in Georgia. At each site, the densities of live and dead S. alterniflora stems with and without epiphytes were measured in high and low marsh zones. Samples of live and dead stems with and without epiphytes were collected from each location and analyzed microscopically for the presence of meiofauna. Live stems were more prevalent than dead stems at all sites. However, dead stems tended to support more epiphytic algae and animals than live S. alterniflora stems regardless of marsh zone, site, or state. Epiphytic algae were more common on both live and dead S. alterniflorain Georgia than in Connecticut. Microscopic animals were more abundant on stems with epiphytes than on bare stems at all sites in both states. The composition of the animal communities inhabiting S. alterniflorastems varied from site to site, but the animal communities at sites in Georgia were more similar to each other than they were to sites in Connecticut, with one exception. Differences in animal community composition were driven primarily by higher abundances of nematodes at three of the four Georgia sites than the Connecticut sites and the remaining Georgia site. Our results highlight the importance of even dead marsh plant tissue to the overall marsh food web.

College and Major available

Biology, Philosophy, Theology, Rel. Studies

Location

University Commons

Start Day/Time

4-24-2019 2:00 PM

End Day/Time

4-24-2019 5:00 PM

Students' Information

Cassie Simonides Biology/Philosophy, 2020

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License.

Prize Categories

Most Scholarly Impact or Potential, Best Visuals, Most Creative

Share

COinS
 
Apr 24th, 2:00 PM Apr 24th, 5:00 PM

Distribution of Epiphytes and Meiofauna on Live and Dead Spartina Alterniflora Stems in Connecticut and Georgia Salt Marshes

University Commons

Epiphyte communities are increasingly recognized as important contributors to marsh food webs. However, little is known about the distribution of epiphytic organisms inhabiting Spartina alterniflora stems. This study examined epiphytic algae and meiofauna on S. alterniflora stems at four sites in Connecticut and four sites in Georgia. At each site, the densities of live and dead S. alterniflora stems with and without epiphytes were measured in high and low marsh zones. Samples of live and dead stems with and without epiphytes were collected from each location and analyzed microscopically for the presence of meiofauna. Live stems were more prevalent than dead stems at all sites. However, dead stems tended to support more epiphytic algae and animals than live S. alterniflora stems regardless of marsh zone, site, or state. Epiphytic algae were more common on both live and dead S. alterniflorain Georgia than in Connecticut. Microscopic animals were more abundant on stems with epiphytes than on bare stems at all sites in both states. The composition of the animal communities inhabiting S. alterniflorastems varied from site to site, but the animal communities at sites in Georgia were more similar to each other than they were to sites in Connecticut, with one exception. Differences in animal community composition were driven primarily by higher abundances of nematodes at three of the four Georgia sites than the Connecticut sites and the remaining Georgia site. Our results highlight the importance of even dead marsh plant tissue to the overall marsh food web.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.