First and Last Name/s of Presenters

Dominique FelixFollow

Mentor/s

Professors Brian Stilner & Sandra Young

Participation Type

Paper Talk

Abstract

Gavin Newsom, the governor of California, signed the Fair Pay to Play Act on September 30, 2019, making it illegal for institutions to revoke an athlete's scholarship if they decide to make money from their name, image, or likeness (NIL). This was a turning point in collegiate athletics as multiple lawsuits against the NCAA had been brought by athletes who had competed in the past and were still competing because of the unfairness of "amateurism." (Fresh). After California started the process, the NCAA retracted its regulation, saying that student-athletes may not commercialize their NIL. The Supreme Court added pressure on the NCAA to modify its antiquated practices. While this was a significant advancement in paying players for the time and effort they devote to their sport, it also raised several issues that need more investigation, including how this may affect non-revenue-generating sports.

College and Major available

Finance BS

Location

Session 4: Digital Commons & Martire 3rd floor Boardroom

Start Day/Time

4-27-2023 11:00 AM

End Day/Time

4-27-2023 12:15 PM

Students' Information

Dominique Felix: finance major, accounting minor. Summer 2023

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License.

Share

COinS
 
Apr 27th, 11:00 AM Apr 27th, 12:15 PM

Name, Image, Likeness & It's Impact on College Athletics

Session 4: Digital Commons & Martire 3rd floor Boardroom

Gavin Newsom, the governor of California, signed the Fair Pay to Play Act on September 30, 2019, making it illegal for institutions to revoke an athlete's scholarship if they decide to make money from their name, image, or likeness (NIL). This was a turning point in collegiate athletics as multiple lawsuits against the NCAA had been brought by athletes who had competed in the past and were still competing because of the unfairness of "amateurism." (Fresh). After California started the process, the NCAA retracted its regulation, saying that student-athletes may not commercialize their NIL. The Supreme Court added pressure on the NCAA to modify its antiquated practices. While this was a significant advancement in paying players for the time and effort they devote to their sport, it also raised several issues that need more investigation, including how this may affect non-revenue-generating sports.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.