First and Last Name/s of Presenters

Cody DavisFollow

Mentor/s

Dr. Gordon Purves

Participation Type

Paper Talk

Abstract

In this paper I will argue for an interpretation of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus as a work of empiricism, as well as an argument for his Philosophical Investigations as a work of pragmatism, and how these two interpretations apply to Wittgenstein’s formulation of solipsism. Specifically, I will show how an empiricist understanding of the Tractatus leads Wittgenstein to his formulation of solipsism, which is untenable because it is unsayable. Similarly, I will show how a pragmatic understanding of the Investigations gives Wittgenstein a “way out” of his Tractarian solipsism, specifically with his formation of the private language argument as a direct response to his earlier views on solipsism.

Location

Session 3: Digital Commons & Martire Room 259

Start Day/Time

4-25-2024 11:00 AM

End Day/Time

4-25-2024 12:15 PM

Students' Information

Cody Davis - Philosophy/Political Science double major, Honors minor, Spring 2024.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License

Share

COinS
 
Apr 25th, 11:00 AM Apr 25th, 12:15 PM

Wittgenstein, Empiricism, and Pragmatism: Examining the Evolution of Wittgensteinian Solipsism

Session 3: Digital Commons & Martire Room 259

In this paper I will argue for an interpretation of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus as a work of empiricism, as well as an argument for his Philosophical Investigations as a work of pragmatism, and how these two interpretations apply to Wittgenstein’s formulation of solipsism. Specifically, I will show how an empiricist understanding of the Tractatus leads Wittgenstein to his formulation of solipsism, which is untenable because it is unsayable. Similarly, I will show how a pragmatic understanding of the Investigations gives Wittgenstein a “way out” of his Tractarian solipsism, specifically with his formation of the private language argument as a direct response to his earlier views on solipsism.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.