Mentor/s

Dr. Kathryn Kroeper

Participation Type

Poster

Abstract

Confrontation reduces prejudice by eliciting negative self-directed emotions, like guilt, which promotes self-regulation, and shame, which shifts focus to the self, decreasing the likelihood of constructive actions. Despite their distinct effects, past research has often conflated guilt and shame. The present study aims to develop and validate a psychological measure that clearly distinguishes guilt as a behavior-focused emotion and shame as a person-focused emotion. We asked 194 undergraduate students to recall a time where they were confronted for saying something biased, offensive, or insensitive toward a group of people. They then rated the extent to which they experienced guilt or shame in that situation using newly developed measures designed to distinguish between these emotions. Participants reported their behavioral responses to the confrontation, including whether they engaged (or planned to engage) in self-correction. A confirmatory factor analysis examining all six emotions as separate factors adequately fit the data. As predicted, guilt was strongly associated with self-correction (r = .749, p < .001) and negatively associated with defensiveness (r = -.179, p = .013), consistent with its role as a behavior-focused emotion that motivates constructive action. In contrast, shame was most strongly linked to withdrawal (r = .528, p < .001), with weaker ties to self-correction and no detectable association with defensiveness, reflecting its inward focus on personal inadequacy. These measures can help researchers understand why some confrontations reduce prejudice while others fail or backfire, and may also be useful in other contexts where distinguishing between guilt and shame is important.

College and Major available

Psychology BS

Academic Level

Undergraduate student

Location

Digital Commons & West Campus West Building University Commons

Start Day/Time

4-25-2025 12:00 PM

End Day/Time

4-25-2025 2:00 PM

Students' Information

Katherine Dempsey, Psychology Major, Honors student, Class of 2025

Amanda Hamel, Psychology Major, Class of 2025

Talia Torrens, Psychology Major, Honors student, Class of 2027

Isabelle Berube, Psychology Major, Class of 2025

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License

Prize Categories

Most Scholarly Impact or Potential, Most Transformative for Social Justice, Most Creative

Share

COinS
 
Apr 25th, 12:00 PM Apr 25th, 2:00 PM

Exploring Guilt and Shame: Emotional Responses to Bias Through Reflection on Past Experiences

Digital Commons & West Campus West Building University Commons

Confrontation reduces prejudice by eliciting negative self-directed emotions, like guilt, which promotes self-regulation, and shame, which shifts focus to the self, decreasing the likelihood of constructive actions. Despite their distinct effects, past research has often conflated guilt and shame. The present study aims to develop and validate a psychological measure that clearly distinguishes guilt as a behavior-focused emotion and shame as a person-focused emotion. We asked 194 undergraduate students to recall a time where they were confronted for saying something biased, offensive, or insensitive toward a group of people. They then rated the extent to which they experienced guilt or shame in that situation using newly developed measures designed to distinguish between these emotions. Participants reported their behavioral responses to the confrontation, including whether they engaged (or planned to engage) in self-correction. A confirmatory factor analysis examining all six emotions as separate factors adequately fit the data. As predicted, guilt was strongly associated with self-correction (r = .749, p < .001) and negatively associated with defensiveness (r = -.179, p = .013), consistent with its role as a behavior-focused emotion that motivates constructive action. In contrast, shame was most strongly linked to withdrawal (r = .528, p < .001), with weaker ties to self-correction and no detectable association with defensiveness, reflecting its inward focus on personal inadequacy. These measures can help researchers understand why some confrontations reduce prejudice while others fail or backfire, and may also be useful in other contexts where distinguishing between guilt and shame is important.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.