Document Type
Peer-Reviewed Article
Publication Date
2024
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in braking and propulsion force-time characteristics and barbell velocity between traditional (TRAD) and accentuated eccentric loaded (AEL) back squats using various load combinations. Sixteen resistance-trained men participated in four separate testing sessions which included a one repetition maximum (1RM) back squat during the first session and three squat testing sessions. During the squat testing sessions, participants either performed sets of three repetitions of TRAD back squats each with 50, 60, 70, and 80% 1RM or performed the same loads with the addition of weight releasers that increased the total eccentric weight of the first repetition of each set to either 100 (AEL-MAX) or 110% 1RM (AEL-SUPRA). Braking and propulsion mean force, duration, and impulse as well as mean and peak barbell velocity were compared between each condition and load. Significantly greater braking impulses were produced during the AEL-MAX and AEL-SUPRA conditions compared to TRAD (p < 0.03) with small-moderate effect sizes favoring AEL-SUPRA. No other significant differences existed among conditions for other braking, propulsion, or barbell velocity variables. AEL-MAX and AEL-SUPRA back squats may provide a greater braking stimulus compared to TRAD squats; however, the propulsion phase of the movement does not appear to be impacted. From a loading standpoint, larger and smaller load spreads may favor rapid and maximal force production characteristics, respectively. Further research on this topic is needed as a large portion of the braking stimulus experienced during AEL back squats may be influenced by relative strength.
DOI
10.5114/jhk/185726
Recommended Citation
Suchomel, T. J., Cantwell, C. J., Campbell, B. A., Schroeder, Z. S., Marshall, L. K., Taber, C. B. (2024). Braking and propulsion phase characteristics of traditional and accentuated eccentric loaded back squats. Journal of Human Kinetics, 91, 121-133. Doi:10.5114/jhk/185726
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Comments
Open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license