Meaningful Change in Walking Speed
Document Type
Peer-Reviewed Article
Publication Date
4-2012
Program
Physical Therapy
Abstract
Evidence-based practitioners need to consider the sensitivity to change or “responsiveness” of outcome measures such as walking speed. The responsiveness of an outcome measure refers to its ability to accurately detect a change or difference when it has occurred. In this review, we first describe distribution-based and anchor-based methods and the most commonly reported indexes of responsiveness (ie, effect size, standard error of the measurement, minimal detectable change, standardized response mean, and minimal clinically important difference) for walking speed. We then summarize and synthesize the recent literature on the responsiveness of walking speed in different populations of older adults, patients with neurologic conditions (ie, stroke, Parkinson’s disease, and Alzheimer’s disease), and patients with orthopedic conditions (ie, hip fracture and knee osteoarthritis). In all of the studies cited, walking speed was sensitive to change over time and, when looking across studies, there is considerable agreement that meaningful change in walking speed is approximately 0.1 ms.
DOI
10.1097/TGR.0b013e3182510195
Recommended Citation
Chui, Kevin, Ethan Hood, and Dennis Klima. "Meaningful Change in Walking Speed." Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation 28.2 (2012): 97-103.
Publication
Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
97-103
Comments
Published: Chui, Kevin, Ethan Hood, and Dennis Klima. "Meaningful Change in Walking Speed." Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation 28.2 (2012): 97-103.